From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Curious. "Some examples of when legal loopholes have been used are: [example of a loophole which was not used]"


This line:

Usually these gay but perverted lawyers want us to not find holes so they can fuc them

It has some merit, but it's overly vulgar, and I don't know enough about the subject to say whether it's true or false, and whichever it is, I'm not qualified to ameliorate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallenangei (talkcontribs) 00:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


It may be worth to link this article to a currently discussed loophole that already has a related article on wikipedia, like gun show loophole for instance —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Ford Transit imported from turkey to avoid the chicken tax?[edit]

Classic. Davez621 (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


How is CopyLeft related to Loopholes? CopyLeft is just a method of keeping a software "libre" while putting obstacles before anyone trying to claim exclusive rights for that software. It uses the copyright to achieve this, but is in no way trying to violate or walk around copyright. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


"However, the Nunica Internet Social Alliance was founded as a method to exploit a loophole in YouTube's song blocking by making promo videos for freely downloadable MP3 albums from Nisa Records which contain the blocked music, but without the blocked music in the promo videos, in which the albums can be found on underground file hosting sites."

That may make sense if you already know what it is talking about. I think I get it after reading it four times but I think one should be able get it on the first reading. (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)