Talk:M'zab

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M'zab article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Algeria Mid‑importance

	Algeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Berbers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Berbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerbersWikipedia:WikiProject BerbersTemplate:WikiProject BerbersBerbers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History

When I look back into old versions of it, for example 22:21, 7 August 2006 it appears as a much better version than the one I found. I started with partially correcting the horrible English and layout. The old version should be restored or at least merged with the new version, as it had several facts simply removed in the new one.Norrefeldt 13:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Isn't that picture ... you know ... fake ? I mean whatever that building is, it's NOT 3500 years old. It's not even 100 years old. Look at the curves, look at everything. Such a building wouldn't have remained standing in a mild climate with a bit of range for 10 years, and will certainly not withstand the regular sandblasts it gets in the desert for any length of time.

Even if you assume the wood has been replaced. Wikipedia's credibility is already somewhat ... tarnished. This is not the way to go about improving it.

That is definitely not Ghardaia... it's some sort of monument or artistic expression of Ghardaia. The picture should be removed and replaced with an authentic image. 188.223.87.184 (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For example, here is a recent image of the real Ghardaia: [[1]] 188.223.87.184 (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valley?

I noticed that UNESCO's page specifies the name as "M'zab Valley" - if this article is intended to be about the World Heritage Site in particular then should we update the name so it is consistent with UNESCO's name? If it is not about the W.H.S., then perhaps we should separate out the information specific to the W.H.S. into a new page? AntarcticPenguin (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on M'zab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode

In the present version of the page (2023-09-11 10:15 UTC) there are two examples of unicode glyphs in the page that seem to have been there for a while but I am not sure of their correctness, can someone more knowledgeable than me double check?

"Wəd" here:

> along the Wəd Mzab collectively

and "Σezzaba" here:

> and Ibāḍī Σezzaba continue to dominate

Thanks.

Mnl (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]