This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
In this article, the term stationary set set is used in the definition of Mahlo cardinal. It's linked, which is good, but the linked article offers three distinct notions of stationary. Which one is the one to use? YohanN7 (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
We are talking about the classical notion, as is almost always the case. This is the simplest notion. Whenever one is talking about subsets of ordinals (rather than, say, subsets of the power set of an ordinal), then the classical notion is being used.
So for our purposes, a stationary set is a set which always has a nonempty intersection with any closed unbounded set. Where "set" here means a subset of a fixed ordinal, κ, which has uncountable cofinality. JRSpriggs (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. I think it would be nice to somehow get this into the article. I'm probably not the only one the will wonder. Simplest and ugliest would be to add a parenthetical remark:
The pronunciation may vary some depending on how the vowels are pronoucned; the first vowel in particular has a lot of realizations in the US. But I would pronounce the name as /mɑloʊ/, I believe. — Carl (CBM · talk) 00:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Notice that Paul Mahlo was German, if that affects the pronunciation. JRSpriggs (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)