Talk:Manav Rachna University

Manav Rachna University was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 8, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

India: Haryana Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as High-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Manav Rachna University be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in India may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Note

Hello there. Please do not put this up for deletion for a while. I am working with the creator to get this up and running. I already know the sources need work and the whole thing needs copy-editing, but that will take a few days to complete. Thanks for your consideration. Sven Manguard _Talk 05:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE

please dont delete this article. just tell me what changes should be made in this article to make it look appropriate. i have no intention to advertise this college. i just created this article as i am a student of this college and it was heartbreaking for me to not have my college on wikipedia. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Garvitkamboj (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

I have done some editing on my own to make it look like a good article rather than an advertisement. I request Sven sir to edit this article according to wikipedia guidelines. thanksGarvitkamboj (talk) 12:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Manav Rachna College of Engineering/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 122.176.150.135 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outside comment I'm rather concerned that the IP doing the review here has no other edits except for starting this. As someone who has followed this article from afar, I'd be willing to do the review if the starting of the review is some sort of mistake. If not, I'll just observe. Just a note, this article has had some strange history, see this. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, Sven, IPs can't review articles. They can nominate them, but not review. So, feel free to go ahead with the review. Dana boomer (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I'm probably too involved to do the review. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Technical fail

IPs can't do reviews so I am failing this nomination. Looking at the article it is not of GA standards, if the niomintor wants feedback, try reading WP:WIAGA and perhaps a peer review. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.