Talk:Margaret (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Anime and manga Mid‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Margaret Comics

I came across some red links linking to Margaret Comics, I'm pretty sure they're talking about the same magazine as this one. I'd like to redirect Margaret Comics to this article, but can someone confirm that the title of the magazine is just 'Margaret' and not 'Margaret Comics'? Or are they different magazines? Ninja neko 17:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Margaret Comics" is Shueisha's imprint for tankoubon of manga that originally ran in Margaret and its sister magazines...it is not the name of a magazine. (A lot of people get imprints and magazines confused, and end up thinking that, say, "Flower Comics" is a magazine, but actually it's Shogakukan's shoujo imprint...etc...) Doinkies 03:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WeeklyMargaret1973 20.jpg

Image:WeeklyMargaret1973 20.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20171022032712/http://margaretbookstore.com/item/SHSA_MG01M20421MA1710_57.html to http://margaretbookstore.com/item/SHSA_MG01M20421MA1710_57.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Title in Japanese

@Juhachi: I looked at the source listed for マ➰ガレット and it honestly looks like a stylization? I looked around for Japanese sources and literally none of them use ➰ as the actual character. Even in the photo, it looks drawn differently. lullabying (talk) 23:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifying, not so much as "stylization" but more like graphic design (i.e. similar to dotting your i's and j's with hearts). lullabying (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's probably not that important and can probably be removed then. Or included as a footnote.--十八 00:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's best if it's removed. Shueisha has not confirmed themselves on using the character ➰ in writing and even then the way it's drawn on the magazine cover looks different than ➰. lullabying (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]