Talk:Marine Life Park
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marine Life Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Nanyang Technological University/ Information Technology (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Killing dolphins?
[edit]There are online petitions doing the rounds at the moment that claim that Resorts World Sentosa traps and kills wild dolphins in a bizarre attempt to "exhibit" them. Eg Avaaz has one called Save the Saddest Dolphins.
Does anyone have any info on this? NZ forever (talk) 05:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
The topic on the dolphin controversy apparent at RWS marine life park.
[edit]Can Sni56996 justify why my addition to the wikipage is wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qumar69 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
POV issues with "Controversy" section.
[edit]I made a number of edits on this page. First, there were obvious POV issues with non-neutral language, especially with the overuse of the word "controversy", even using the word when there is no sign of it in the sourced article. Also there are obvious attempts to draw specific attention to things like "the park failed to act/reply" or "the same court court lifted the ban despite" etc. Please stick to reporting the facts and avoiding original research/weasel commentary.
Also there is a lack of sourcing for some of the content; I commented out the part about some dolphins (not Wen Wen) having reportedly died in captive, when there are no sources given to back up the statement. And in one case, a youtube link was being used as a source.
Lets not forget Wiki Guidelines and Policies when making our edits guys. Zhanzhao (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marine Life Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710204618/http://www.etravelblackboardasia.com/article.asp?id=56659&nav=21 to http://www.etravelblackboardasia.com/article.asp?id=56659&nav=21
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)