Talk:Markle Windsor Foundation

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Markle Windsor Foundation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Article template[edit]

Hi @Bettydaisies : Apart from updating this article, an appropriate template is now available should you or anyone else decide to create a separate Archewell page. Sampajanna (talk) 02:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for letting me know and for your contributions. I'll have to do some reading regarding it's status as both a corporation and a charitable entity, and I definitely commend you for the research that's gone into this page.--Bettydaisies (talk) 03:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bettydaisies : Markle Windsor Foundation was essentially an abandoned orphan article. Now that it's been researched and updated, it should help draw a line under the pre-Archewell days, especially since Archewell is registered in the USA not the UK like MWX (Sussex Royal). No doubt, sooner or later, a separate page will be required for Archewell. Perhaps, sooner would be better to avoid overload and confusion on both the Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pages. Additionally, Archewell activities can be clearly distinguished. For example, Archewell Audio, Archewell Awards, and so on. Thereby, minimising any possible confusion between the private and commercial activities of the Sussexes Sampajanna (talk) 04:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I agree, especially since their two totally separate, but notable entities. I've created a draft to submit at Draft:Archewell (in American spelling) which as much information as I could find.--Bettydaisies (talk) 04:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bettydaisies : Sorted. It looks like Archewell is now live on Wikipedia. Sampajanna (talk) 05:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! Thank you for the collaboration.--Bettydaisies (talk) 06:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution[edit]

NOTE : Please try to stay in the top three sections of this pyramid.

Claim of fraud[edit]

@Greyhounddani: On 18 December 2020, your first ever contribution to Wikipedia was to attack / vandalize the Markle Windsor Foundation page and its editors as follows: "None of the information on this page is true and the person who created it is a fraud and the entire post should be deleted! Noting that you have only contributed to Markle Windsor and Archewell, please disclose if you have any WP:COI conflict of interest. Sampajanna (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]