Talk:Mars landing

Spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Marsexpressimage.jpg

Image:Marsexpressimage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with Exploration of Mars

I agree with the proposed merger with Exploration of Mars, as landings are part of Mars exploration. BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose merging it with Exploration of Mars. The article Exploration of Mars is long enough as it is. YouthoNation (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Requires Major Editing Or Deletion

There is no mention of the US Mariner probes (Mariner 4 was the first successful flyby in 1964, Mariners 6 & 7 flew by in 1969, Mariner 9 was the first successful orbiter), despite extensive coverage of other non-landing spacecraft (Phobos, MGS, Odyssey, Nozomi, etc.), which itself is inconsistent with the article's title. Article seems heavily biased towards Soviet/Russian spacecraft.

Recommend a complete re-edit to focus solely on landers, or delete this article entirely and cross-reference to other better-researched and maintained articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.28.28 (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First soft landing

The article as it stands is inconsistent: it describes a soft landing by Mars 3 in 1971, then says that the Viking probes in 1976 made the first successful soft landing ...

--Davidfraser (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mars landing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080416155537/http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru:80/content/numbers/213/50.shtml to http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/213/50.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenuity in this page

Can we add ingenuity to this page it take vertical takeoff and landings Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

India?

The intro paragraph claims that India has successfully landed on Mars - but there is no mention of it anywhere in the article and a cursory web search brings up nothing. What gives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.185.79 (talk) 03:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First reference link is broken

Hey there, I have never edited Wikipedia, so forgive me if I'm mistaken, but as I've been researching I've discovered reference no.1 seems to be broken or no longer available on the NASA website, instead leading to a 404 page. Is there a protocol or rule for adding archive links? Like I said, I've never done any of this before, if someone wants to fix it, I would be very grateful. Thanks! :) 120.159.202.230 (talk) 09:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]