I am (finally) reviewing this article. The article appears stable, neutral and appropriately referenced. Images appear in order, though I feel "Northbound MD 313 at intersection with MD 544" does not add much and is poor quality, and might better be removed.
I have undertaken a copyedit. Editors should check that I have not inappropriately altered the sense of the text.
There is no information about the structure or construction of any of the bridges along the route. If this information is available, it should be included.
No significant landmarks are mentioned along this route. I am assuming that means there are none, but if that is incorrect, then anything supported by reliable sources should be included.
On the basis that there are no significant omissions in relation to the above two points, this article qualifies for GA. I will await any comment in relation to the above, before passing it. Thanks. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I have gone back and looked at the article, fixing the image caption. As with MD 97, The specific dates for bridge construction are unknown. Also, there are no significant landmarks along the route as it simply passes through rural areas of the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Dough4872 (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)