Jump to content

Talk:Mass media in Turkey/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Political views of this page

"Since 2011, the AKP government has increased restrictions on freedom of speech, freedom of the press and internet use" it is information with reference. What I understand in here is if some newspaper call United States terrorist country, will we add this information to United States page? Some references from specific newspaper shouldn't be references for these information. I understand that most of Turkish people who aganist to goverment in Turkey wants to write some specific information and news to here but I don't think that they are significant and trustworthy information. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Many articles and reports from various respected national and international media outlets have been referenced here. Including BBC, Bloomberg, New York Times, Huffington Post, Hürriyet Daily News etc. If you don't think that they are significant and trustworthy information, well I don't know what else to say. If you have counter-arguments, write them with their references, it's that simple. But do not attamp to delete them just because you think they are not important. Gezginrocker (talk) 22:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Is it significant information for this article?

By circulation, the most popular daily newspapers are Zaman, Posta, Hürriyet, Sabah, Habertürk and Sözcü and newspapers with oppositional editorial line against the government corresponds to 65% of daily newspapers in circulation while pro-government newspapers's share is 25%.[2][3] The broadcast media have a very high penetration as satellite dishes and cable systems are widely available.[1] The "Radio and Television Supreme Council" (RTÜK) is the government body overseeing the broadcast media.[1]MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it's very significiant info. Firts of all, even %25 corresponds to a large number. Second, that section doesn't only talk about pro-AKP media,it talks about AKP's control over media, columnists losing their jobs etc. If a prime minister commands his man to censor news he doesn't like, yes this is significiant info. And I'd like to remind you that Erdogan accepted that leaked tapes were true and he interfered with media. The title of the section can be discussed, but the article definitely belongs here and it is significant.Gezginrocker (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Simple proof of political view

By circulation, the most popular daily newspapers are Zaman, Posta, Hürriyet, Sabah, Habertürk and Sözcü and newspapers with oppositional editorial line against the government corresponds to 65% of daily newspapers in circulation while pro-government newspapers's share is 25%.[2][3] The broadcast media have a very high penetration as satellite dishes and cable systems are widely available.[1] The "Radio and Television Supreme Council" (RTÜK) is the government body overseeing the broadcast media.[1]

it was second paragraph of this article

in Pro-AKP media section we can see that media group again

Leading pro-AKP newspapers are Yeni Şafak, Akit, Sabah, Star, Takvim, Akşam, Türkiye, Milli Gazete, Güneş, and Milat, among others. Leading pro-AKP TV channels are Kanal 7, 24, Ülke TV, TRT, ATV, TGRT, Sky Turk 360, TV Net, NTV, TV8, Beyaz TV, Kanaltürk, and Kanal A. Leading pro-government internet portals are Haber 7, Habervaktim and En Son Haber. Leading pro-AKP news agencies are state owned Anadolu Agency and İhlas News Agency.

Is same article we see Sabah aganist to Goverment and with Goverment. it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

No, you understood it wrong, in the first paragraph it does not say Sabah is anti-government. There are 2 different sentences. "By circulation, the most popular daily newspapers are Zaman, Posta, Hürriyet, Sabah, Habertürk and Sözcü" and "newspapers with oppositional editorial line against the government corresponds to 65% of daily newspapers in circulation while pro-government newspapers's share is 25%." are different sentences. Gezginrocker (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

They won't listen to you because they all read newspapers which know Turkey better than Turkish newspapers and they ALL UNBIASED (approved by God). They all independent and free newspapers they don't have any political agenda and not connected with any capitalist rich people. But, lets look of Turkey all of them connected with AKP government want proof? look at UNBIASED citations of xxx times. How can they know, they don't need to know because they like it. HOW OPEN MINDED, REALLY ADMIRE WESTERN PEOPLE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.253.111.182 (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Media of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Media of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mass_media_in_Turkey/Archive_1&oldid=1170133710"