Talk:Mediterranean Theater of Operations, United States Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question[edit]

Were there any forces in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations besides the 15th Army Group/Allied Forces in Italy? If so, this would be useful to indicate. john k (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just adding - I'd assume there must have been air and naval units attached, so that would be useful to discuss in more detail. john k (talk) 00:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Amphibious Forces, Atlantic Fleet/NavNAW; Mediterranean Allied Air Forces; the Mediterranean Fleet; Middle East Command; Middle East Air Forces; and others. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Mystery of the Name[edit]

Is N.A.T.O. a backronym? Just wondering...Bosredsox24 (talk) 01:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking the page????[edit]

Dozens of editors have worked on this page since 2004 and it is a valuable treatment of a important topic. There is very little overlap in terms of text with the article on Mediterranean and Middle East Theatre--this article covers the U.S. Army's command structure, and the other one covers the military operations of a number of different countries countries, with the US playing a minor role-- much less so than Great Britain. So let us keep this. Rjensen (talk) 01:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The number of editors who has worked on the article is irrelevant. It had not been edited in about six months before it was made a redirect, and it has barely been edited over the years. The article is redundant. It covers the same scope as the Mediterranean and Middle East Theatre article. The article briefly talks about the command structure that was in place. The article is a stub at best. Ideally, the information here should be integrated into the other. There should not be two articles for everything: one covering a theater of war, and another discussion the same thing from the American point of view.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Rjensen it is a different topic from Mediterranean and Middle East Theatre which is an article about an multinational operational theatre. -- PBS (talk) 08:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
quite so. note that we have major books explicitly devoted to the topic such as Ernest F. Fisher, Jr. (1993). United States Army in World War 2, Mediterranean Theater of Operations, Cassino to the Alps: With a Portfolio of Maps. Government Printing Office. p. 9.: Rjensen (talk) 10:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Mediterranean Theater of Operations, United States Army, was a military formation of the US Army. The Mediterranean and Middle East theatre was the whole area of fighting. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hawkeye7 you've written the whole SWPA article, and are very familiar with these arcane administrative structures. NATOUSA and MTOUSA were US Army administrative supports to AFHQ, which was actually directing the fighting; can you review my recent edits, please? Buckshot06 (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've made some changes and corrections. I'll reference the entire article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]