Jump to content

Talk:Memento Mori (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Again, "The episode is one of those which helped to explore the series' overarching mythology." I feel this should be rewritten as "This episode helps to explore the series' overarching mythology."
    No mention of production in the intro
    I would cite the guest stars at the very end, but that's just me
    "The scene which would have established the character was intended to echo a similar scene in the second season episode "One Breath", which featured Don S. Davis as Scully's father" How does it echo?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All good
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neural POV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit warring
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One picture, properly tagged. Are there any other free pictures to spice up the production section? You know how I like those pictures!
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review I think I've got everything now. Had to poke about for an image, eventually just settled on the old Spotnitz and Carter one. Nothing else really had an associated image to use. Let me know if I've missed anything. GRAPPLE X 16:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Everything looks good. I like that new picture, too. I pass this article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]