Talk:Merton Rule
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 May 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Plagiarism?
[edit]- You nicked all this from [[1]] i dont care, but some annoying wiki addict type will notice one day...
Its also not exactly POV free either? Still very informative. But it is plagurism (sp).
Bjrobinson 22:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, I copied it from myself. Jdaviescoates
- Lol, nice one. Well its still not NPOV, but i guess that can be sorted easy :) Bjrobinson 10:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Amendment Proposal
[edit]- Is it worth amending the last sentence "though the ability of Councils to require additional energy efficiency measures in new buildings was removed."? The amendment to the Planning and Energy Act that revokes this power has not commenced, has no commencement date and was originally intended to commence with the introduction of Zero Carbon Homes in 2016, which will now not commence either. As a result, LPAs can still set standard for energy efficiency in new homes above building regs, though this might be capped at the equivalent of CSH4 depending on how much weight you give to Written Ministerial Statements. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/planning-update-march-2015
Sorry for the anonymous update - I'm not a Wikipedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.140.17 (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hatnote added
[edit]- I added a hatnote directing folks that are looking for the Merton Rule in Mathematics to Mean speed theorem. The need for this disambiguation was noted in the deletion discussion linked above. Voyager640 (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Merton Rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319002403/http://london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/consultations/draft-sustainable-design-and-construction to https://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/consultations/draft-sustainable-design-and-construction
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)