Talk:Michael Carrington Esq
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why Esq?
[edit]"Esq" is used for attorneys. There is nothing in this article which indicates that Carrington is an attorney. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
To help differentiate this English man from the American, Michael Carrington.
Oxford English Dictionary The designation of ‘esquire’ is now commonly understood to be due by courtesy to all persons (not in clerical orders or having any higher title of rank) who are regarded as ‘gentlemen’ by birth, position, or education. In the U.S. the title belongs officially to lawyers and public officers.
- How does the son of an electrical engineer qualify as "gentleman by birth"? User:Zoe|(talk) 22:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
That's rather a snobbish question. Mr Carrington is an honourable man of good social position - by definition a gentleman.
Requested Move
[edit]The information on this page appears to be identical to the existing Michael Carrington (TV) page, and there is no precedent that I am aware of for disambiguation people with the term 'Esq'. --Rbreen (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Being bold and redirecting to identical page at Michael Carrington (TV). Mcmullen writes (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)