Talk:Michiel Smit
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The last three paragraphs of this article is pure propaganda. Looks like some memorised brainwashing and is never compatible with the NPOV criteria of Wiki. Behemoth 01.02.2006 06:53 (UTC)
Could you (Behemoth) please expand on your statement that this article is propaganda? It could help in making this article non-biased and thus keeping to the NPOV criteria of Wiki. I failed to find a personal opinion being expressed in this article, unless you are referring to the opinions of Michiel Smit. If this is the case, then how could one create an informative article without reference to the views of Michiel Smit whom this article is about?
- I Don't think that you could call it propaganda. I think that it is just formulated a little bit wrong due to the fact that the writer isn't english :). Sincerely. Thomas-NL 16:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- It should be added that Michiel Smit is an active member of the Dutch/Belgian Stormfront, a fanatical neo-nazi organization 62.238.92.181 14:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- The Dutch/Belgian Stormfront is a webforum. Smit posted there in under the nickname wooninrotterdam (live in Rotterdam) until 2002. He also posted on under the same nickname on the rightist forum Polinco.
- Other than the postings on the Stormfront forum I have never heard of any "allegations of ties with Stormfront". The passage seems to suggest (and as far as I know incorrectly) there is more to it than just postings. I'd suggest it be deleted or substantiated with a source. Even allegations need to come with sources. 67.167.202.253 17:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)