Talk:Microscale chemistry

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Microscale Chemistry reduces the amounts of chemical substances used. By decreasing the quantities of these substances to the minimum level at which experiments can be effectively performed chemical waste is reduced [1]. Microscale Chemistry Experiments (MCE) have additional advantages: · More safety · Suitable from early childhood education [2] [3] up to higher education · Lower costs for chemical substances and equipment · Smaller storage area · Reduced reliance on intensive ventilation systems · Pleasant working atmosphere: “Armchair Chemistry” [4]. · Shorter reaction times · More time for evaluation and communication.

Up to secondary education the substances and materials for MCE are in the range between 5 milliliter and 5 microliter (1 mg). Most of the substances are available in supermarkets and pharmacies.

MCE can be used not only for student experiments but also for demonstration via overhead projector or digital camera. MCE can be performed at home and even in the garden. It is Green Chemistry.

MCE was introduced into higher education at Cairo Medical School in 1924 [5] . Microscale Chemistry is recognized as Smallscale Chemistry by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

References [edit] 1National Microscale Chemistry Center Andover MA USA (2003). What is Microscale Chemistry? 2 Schwarz, Peter (2000). Experimenting, observing, measuring at Istanbul International Small Hands Academy. 3 Schwarz, Peter (2004). Microscale science experimentation for Kindergarten children using packings. Journal of Science Education vol. 5, No 1, 49-50 4 Aleya, Hubert N. (1974) Armchair Chemistry A Programmed Laboratory Manual. Second edition. Princeton University 5 Grey, E. C. (1928) Practical Chemistry by Micro-Methods. W.Heffer & Sons Ltd. Cambridge. Link title

I've added a POV tag to this, as at the moment it reads like an ad for someone selling microscale apparatus. Thoughts? Jianaran (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Microscale chemistry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]