Talk:Military.com

United States: Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Cleanup

This article could use both expension and wikification. As it is right now, it looks partly like an advertisment, but since it has potential, it seems to deserve its own article. --Spring Rubber 09:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Military.com, is the nation's largest military membership organization.... So what nation would that be then? Arcturus 20:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be something to mention that military.com spams the hell out of its members. And that it trys to trick veterans into thinking that they recieve there benifets through the website and not the veterans administration. --W7M —Preceding unsigned comment added by W7M (talk • contribs) 23:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monster Worldwide Worries

With Monster Worldwide becoming such a giant, it makes one wonder how much power a site like Military.com has. There are discussion groups within this URL ostensibly for military folks to exchange info and ideas, but it has become a very biased, with the people from the left being systematically eliminated by removal by decidedly conservative and anti-gay moderators. As one of those removed this way, I worry now that Monster, itself, may indeed become a monster, ala FOX.