	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scientific inaccuracy section

I deleted this section for three reasons: 1) the first purported inaccuracy did not make logical sense (unless the description of the film was inaccurate), 2) the second was far too vague to make any sense to someone who hasn't seen the film (which is the article's target audience, mind you), and 3) this might not be noteworthy information even if the previous problems were solved. In a Disney film about time-traveling teens, scientific or logical errors are not inherently noteworthy. Nonetheless, I would not object to putting these items back in once the first is corrected and the second specified. Epistaxis (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the point of the current version of this section at all; for one thing, as was already mentioned, pointing out 'scientific inaccuracies' in a Disney time-travel flick is hardly necessary, and second, the latter half of this section is just a ham-handed description of the Grandfather Paradox, which is an issue with just about any depiction of intentional time travel in fiction. Why this article needs its own separate description of it is beyond me. At the very least, this section should be replaced with a link to Grandfather paradox, although I think a more appropriate solution would be removing it entirely. EhSeuss (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]