Talk:Mobil 1

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Untitled

This page is a total disapointment. It lacks useful information, it seems it was written by a public relations employee and is more directed towards showing Mobil-1 sponsorships than to include technical description of its composition and properties.

This kind of "articles" should be rewritten almost entirely, as it is now, it is a complete disservice to Wikipedia.

WHAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED: viscosity values at different temperatures, load capacity, lubricity data, thermal performance; in essence, the page should serve the purpose of informing the reader about the measured and demonstrable qualities versus propagandistic aspects.

The article cites the mention: "FULLY Synthetic..." But this aspect has been a matter of a strong controversy, because the product (Mobil-1) can only be legally called 'Synthetic' in USA and Canada, but CANNOT be called fully Synthetic in Europe, where the law is more strict.

This subject should be included into the body of the article, if a trueness and completeness of the article are to be considered important. As a Qualified Professional Engineer with experience in this area, I want to call your attention to the fact that Motor Oil characteristics DO vary as a given formulation DEPARTS from a so called "100% Fully Synthetic" formulation.

The (sad) fact that in USA (and other countries) many concepts have been heavily distorted in order to MAKE BELIEVE the unsuspecting public whatever the businesses want them to believe, to raise profits in the most rampant way. Europeans, on the contrary, tend to be more conservative in their specifications and also more demanding (No offense here). That is the reason to insist on the need to DISTINGUISH between a True Synthetic and a mixture that attempts to appear as "100%" Synthetic. If this distintion is omited, Wikipedia readers will NOT be aware of this, and that hurts the whole Wikipedia concept, so, lets include this matter in MORE detail, not less, much less amputating it.

A Terse, well written section on the matter of How-Much 'syntetic' really is this product, is in absolute benefit to Wikipedia readers. When people GET the Wikipedia spirit, they tend to ENRICH an article, certainly not MUTILATING it. As a final note, I do NOT work for ANY company that sells ANY kind of Motor Oils, But we TEST and CERTIFY Motor Oils, so that I have absolutely NO interest in attacking or recommending ANY given product. But when a large company decides to promote its products and starts to STRETCH some concepts, in order to promote its sales or earnings, I am of the opinion that the persons that work in this field of knowledge MUST STEP IN and try to CLARIFY whatever needs to be clarified, in this case, the use of the terms "100% Synthetic", "Fully Synthetic" or similar ones need to be properly clarified. Remember the Old and Wise saying: "There is an ounce of TRUTH in every Lie" which fits this matter. Let's IMPROVE the Mobil-1 page. Sincerely, Alfredo M. Claussen, P.E., Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo, R&D, Mexico City, amarquez@imp.mx

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mobil 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20021203065233/http://www.prod.mobil1.com/racing/index.jsp to http://www.prod.mobil1.com/racing/index.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]