Talk:Mocárabe

Hello!

As far as I know the word Mocárabe doesent exist so this page will have to be redirected to Mozárabe. --Aiveperez 21:22, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The word does it exist and it means something different than Mozárabe. The word is used in the linked website as well as other places.--Bkwillwm 22:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake... Should have known, I was at the alhambra only a couple of months ago:-)--Aiveperez 12:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC) I think mocarabe is the same as muqarna — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.154.39.200 (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The styles are not the same, so I'd oppose a merge. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source

A learned but plain illustrated introduction to the differences between Mocárabe and Muqarnas is at the Alhambra website, Mocárabes versus muqarnas (in Spanish), translated by Google. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mocárabe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051211102428/http://www.vam.ac.uk/res_cons/conservation/journal/number_48/nasrid/ to http://www.vam.ac.uk/res_cons/conservation/journal/number_48/nasrid/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]