|WikiProject Genetics||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Human Genetic History||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
I have added a history section to the article, removed the stub. I have added several images in support of the history section. Added 25 references supporting the history although there is a review of anthropology history written I drafted this history before it was published, and I am familiar with the papers... so. I think many of these papers are good reads. The history section is missing the exact reference to molecular anthropology, I believed it was coined at a conference in 1962 but cannot find the reference. A little trivia. My spelling is bad and grammar sometimes as well. I generally correct things a week after the fact so . . . . .PB666 yap 03:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
What I recommend are sections.
- mtDNA studies with linkouts
- X-linked Loci studies and conclusions
- Y Chromosomal studies with linkouts.
- Autosomal studies with linkouts. PB666 yap 03:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I've added a sentence or two to the introduction explaining certain modifications that have been made subsequent to the studies which have stated a 98% commonality between the human and chimp genomes. Let me know if any editors feel what I have added is contentious. -Ano-User (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
>>>The process of recombination, if frequent enough, corrupts the ability to create parsimonious trees because stretches of amino acid subsititions (SNPs)
I think "because" is a typo.. "between" makes sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)