Jump to content

Talk:Montelukast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drawing

[edit]

The drawing is of Montelukast Sodium, while the article discusses Montelukast. I'll fix the drawing soon. Catbar (Brian Rock) 00:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

[edit]

I removed the part of a sentence that read, "so patients should also be supplied with rescue medication, such as an albuterol inhaler." for two reasons (1) it is not about montelukast, it is about the care that should be taken with asthma patients; and (2) it sounds like medical advice, especially since it uses the word should. It also sounds as if it came right out of the package insert, which it did. --Bejnar 15:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is, however, vitally important information to certain persons interested in Singular. How about replacing it with a preface, e.g.,
Thus the package insert states that asthma patients should also be supplied with rescue medication, such as an albuterol inhaler.
Eres un pen... dejo la palabra — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:1016:6:4D7:1AE:1321:7C97:9FFF (talk) 04:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

[edit]

Please change title from Montelukast to Montelukast Sodium. Singulair generic is Montelukast Sodium - see link to FDA label clearly stating this: [1] I have already noted this before and went to fight with some members over this who did not believe me. I also went to Merk who made sure that now Singulair is updated everywhere it is possible. There are a lot of journal submissions and publications with the incorrect Montelukast in replacement of Montelukast Sodium. Sodium is an active ingredient and not a filler or sub ingredient. I personally nearly died from this little "error" on Wikipedia. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/020829S63-20830S64-21409S40lbl.pdf

Astanton 14:47, 22/10/2015 (Pacific) —Preceding undated comment added 21:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Could Montelukast be inhaled, instead of an oral application?

[edit]

Would that work? Abe 92.192.29.230 (talk) 08:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aggression. How big risk?

[edit]

How many % of patients gets serious side effects, like bad aggressions? Less than 10%? Almost everyone? I did not find it from the source of this: "On June 12, 2009, the FDA concluded their review into the possibility of neuropsychiatric side effects with leukotriene modulator drugs. Although clinical trials only revealed an increased risk of insomnia, post-marketing surveillance showed that the drugs are associated with a possible increase in suicidal behavior and other side effects such as agitation, aggression, anxiousness, dream abnormalities and hallucinations, depression, irritability, restlessness, and tremo"

ee1518 (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too much info?

[edit]

It might be a minor thing, but I feel like the additional information on Zafirlukast and Zileuton should be removed and, in its place, provide "See Also" links towards the bottom for these two drugs. The drugs are definitely related to this one, but they already have their own pages, so it seems redundant to mention them here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.3.198 (talk) 18:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

minor typo

[edit]

Adverse effects - the , should be before rather than after "and". 69.72.92.221 (talk) 08:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential heart disease drug

[edit]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22244598 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.243.106.82 (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montelukast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]