Talk:Mosquito (Psychotic Waltz album)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Significant minority?
[edit]"However, a significant minority regards this album to be their greatest work."
What does this mean? A "significant minority"? What does make this minority significant? That the author of this paragraph is part of it? Who is this who makes this minority significant? And even if there were some people (like special critics or band members), it would be better to mention them or at least specify them ("Some famous critics, e.g. ... regard this album..."). Otherwise this sentence and the term "significant minority" does not make any sense.
I would consider the first part (that this album is the least favorite of many fans) as correct, but it would need some reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.155.254.38 (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:PWskeeter.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:PWskeeter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Tactical change of style?
[edit]What is a tactical change of style? Why was it done? What was the tactic?
How is the songwriting more concise and focused?
How is the "tech-metal wizardry" used more strategically? What strategy was behind it?
What does "tech-metal wizardry" even mean?
I also think - as already stated in another discussion - that the "significant minority" paragraph is either unfounded or heavily biased - if not both. Information like that is also not subject to a general section about an album in my opinion.
To me it seems the whole text is having no essential information about the album. It reads like a personal opinion / comment. The text should rather be removed or replaced by something of factual information.