Talk:Mount Blum
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Geology
[edit]The rock is granite and it's only 15,000 years old? That seems implausible to me, though I'm not a geologist. I don't see how granite (a plutonic rock, formed deep underground) would be brought to the surface, exposed, and formed into a mountain that quickly. I'd love to see a citation. 206.208.105.129 (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mount Blum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The elevation, latitude and longitude do not match the values from reference 2. In particular, the longitude should be W (as in North America) instead of E (as in China).
Ref 2 gives 7638/2328 484514N 1212853W, instead of 7680ft/2340m 47°29′26″N 121°18′04″E.
|
Last edited at 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class Mountain articles
- Low-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Washington articles
- Unknown-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- WikiProject United States articles