This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
I fail to see why this article should file under the Neopaganism project. Mythology, yes; Celtic Studies, yes... I have nothing against Neopaganism or its coverage on Wikipedia; this just doesn't seem to be appropriate or neccessary. Earrach (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2012 (UTC)