Talk:Multi Fibre Arrangement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled[edit]

[1] Haven't heard of the early warning system meantioned here kl;k;lk

WTO "jurisdiction"[edit]

At the GATT Uruguay Round, it was decided to bring the textile trade under the jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization.

Is it correct to talk of "jurisdiction" in the context of the WTO? I know there are legally binding agreements, but there are no WTO judges and courts. Treos 10:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Treos

"Costs" to the developing world[edit]

According to a World Bank/IMF study, the system has cost the developing world 27 million jobs and $40 billion a year in lost exports.

It isn't clear to me why lost exports constitute a 'cost'. A much more important determinant of welfare for a country is surely its imports, which are the source from which consumers derive utilty. If reduced exports mean reduced income and thus reduced consumer spending including imports, I can see that this is a welfare cost, but exports themselves are not a benefit to a country. The reduced exports from the developing to developed worlds should count as a cost to the developed world. 129.67.157.157 (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

MFA[edit]

The MFA per se ended in 1995 and was replaced by the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing: [2]. Ydecreux (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multi Fibre Arrangement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)