Jump to content

Talk:Museum of Romani Culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roma people has been nominated to be improved on the Improvement Drive. Support this article with your vote and help us improve it to featured status!--Fenice 10:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly named article

[edit]

Shouldn't this properly be named "Museum of Roma Culture"? Romani (Romany) is the language; Roma is the name of the people. The word used in the museum's website is "romské"; anyone speak Czech here? ==ILike2BeAnonymous 07:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing no opposition, I went ahead and changed the title, as well as all occurrences of "romany" to "Roma", both here and in the Roma people article which has a link to this one. Also cleaned up the writing, which was very obviously done by someone whose first language is not English. Hint: our language uses a lot more articles (a, an, the, etc.) than you put in. ==ILike2BeAnonymous 22:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems I am comeing pretty late. However, as I can speak Czech I should bring more sacks to the mill. The Czech name of the Museum uses the word romské which is the genitive form of the romská adjective. The meaning is concerning/referring to/relating to Roma people/culture/language etc. etc. If the Museum was only about the language, the Czech name would be: Muzeum romského jazyka or Muzeum romštiny.
So, as ILike2BeAnonymous says that Roma is the name of the people and the Museum is about the people and their culture, I think it is correct to translate the name as "Museum of Roma Culture". --Anglos (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

info "Devastated ghetto" removed

[edit]

I removed the information that Bratislavská street in Brno is a "devastated ghetto", because it is not true. I live in Brno, not too far from Bratislavska street. First, the area of the street and several other streets are inhabited by many Roma people, but the concentration does not reach even 50 per cent. Second, the streets there are not new, and some buildings are rather old, but it is not any devastated ghetto at all. Both the word devastated and ghetto are misleading. --Anglos (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roma or Romani people

[edit]

I'm afraid I too have only just discovered this article. There has been a long debate on Wikipedia about the use of Roma as opposed to Romani people. This is separate from the issue of the Romani language addressed above. Just so that there is coherence in Wikipedia, is the theme of the museum about the wider Romani population around the world or specific to Roma, principally living in continental Europe and exclusive of Sinti, Travellers etc.? The piping in the article is ambiguous. Not speaking Czech, I can't research the museum's web-page to answer this question myself.RashersTierney (talk) 10:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The main theme of the museum is Roma people in central Europe, both Roma, Sinti and Valacchian as these subgroups live in the area of former Czechoslovakia. It does not omit the other groups, however a small museum like that must focus at some part of the issue. There is one permanent exposition The Story of Roma (Příběh Romů) about the modern history of Roma people in central Europe. The museum organises Romani language lessons, lectures about history and culture, and, of course, temporary exhibitions of art. It is nice to see, although it is still quite small. Well, I think it is the first museum of the kind, so one cannot expect tens of large halls with thousands of items. Eh ... Every journey begins with one small step.--Anglos (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anglos. Many thanks for your comprehensive answer. Sounds like a very interesting place. Best.

RashersTierney (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Museum of Romani Culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]