Talk:Mutual insurance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mutual holding companies

What is a "mutual holding company"? The article has an entire section about "mutual holding companies" without explaining what it is!--194.38.144.2 (talk) 08:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference [6] is a broken link. I agree with the friend above as well about "mutual holding companies". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.131.124 (talk) 18:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holding company opinion

The insure.com link doesn't advocate that companies fully demutualize, it merely says that inserting a holding company doesn't retain the benefits of a mutual for the policy holder (stopping short of saying it is the worst of both worlds). Anyway, is this site's opinion notable to be mentioned here?81.159.72.169 (talk) 00:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the problematic part per your 2 year old uncontested proprosal.--Wuerzele (talk) 10:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mutual insurance/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The list of United States mutual insurance companies: Prudential is now a joint stock company; I doubt any of the others are mutual any more. Are there any mutual companies of significant size left? Pring (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Philadelphia Contributionship

Philadelphia Contributionship is mentioned up top. Is it still a mutual insurance company and should it be added under USA below? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.89.201 (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mutual insurance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mutual insurance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110203195346/http://www.icmif.org/members to http://www.icmif.org/members

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]