Jump to content

Talk:Mzaar Kfardebian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

pictures

[edit]

Anybody knows from where and how to upload pictures of the slopes or the resort? I don't like the ones didplayed...

The use of the citation tags is correct. All material must be attributed to a reliable source, preferably with inline citations. WP:CITE is the relevant style guideline. Marasmusine (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • "editors, please do something***

i know nothing about how to edit wikipedia, so please we need the help of some administrator. I believe the article should remove all new edits that are not just technical prior to the oct 2011 version. Faraya is a village but has nothing to do with the ski resort called faraya mzaar or mzaar kfardebian. All over the net people from the Faraya village and people from the Kfaredebiane village fight about the resort name. The fact is that the resort is under the kfardebiane jurisdiction but for historical reasons ( before the 1980's the only road to the resort was through the Faraya village and thre was no road linking Kfardebane to the resort and the founders had nothing to do with any of the two villages, they were a bunch of professionals from Beirut )

people in Lebanon use to say "faraya" to designate the resort.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.200.147.202 (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Nobody says "I ski in Mzaar Kfardebiane" or even knows about this name, everybody in Lebanon says "Faraya". This is one fact. The municipality of Kfardebiane and iKfardebiane have worked hard and successfully (including through lawsuits) to prevent the name "Faraya" to appear on any official document or website. This is another fact. Wikipedia should reflects all facts not only official truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.5.129 (talk) 05:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! It would be weird to say "Mzaar Kfardebian", nobody knows what it means! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.151.231.20 (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is wronly named and I named it for speedy deletion so it gets deleted. I did not do this to harm or anything, but actually I copy/pasted all of its content on my computer and I will do my self a page called Mzaar Kfardebian which contains all of this information about the slopes and everything, and I will do a second page, named Faraya, about the village of Faraya. Because when we search in wikipedia "Faraya" we get the mzaar page and there is no page for faraya and we cant do a page for faraya because "faraya" and "faraya mzaar kfradebian" are used as one page. Regards LebSam8 (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your point. There is another page for Faraya, the village: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraya

Bangabandhu (talk) 02:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC) This page is vandalized by those who want the resort to belong to Faraya and others to Kfardebiane. The latest version was total nonsense. I suggest that administrators either block indefinitely the page or blank it.[reply]

I REALLY THINK PEOPLE SHOULD STOP USING THIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE ON FARAYA MZAAR KFARDEBIANE AS A BATTLEFIELD. THE RESORT USED TO BE CALLED FARAYA BUT IT IS WITHIN KFARDEBIANE JURISDICTION. SO PEOPLE FROM FARAYA STOP REMOVING MENTIONS OF KFARDEBIANE AND KFARDEBIANE PEOPLE STOP EDITING TO REMOVE MENTIONS OF THE NAME FARAYA MZAAR. WHY DONT YOU TRY CONSTRUCTIVE EDITS AND ADD SOURCED INTERESTING INFO ON THE RESORT?

Let us call it faraya desert resort, its jan 31 and there is still no snow!

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mzaar Kfardebian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]