Talk:NTBackup

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Relevance of other products?

The article lists two other products, BackupAssist and Firestreamer. They seem to be ads rather than encyclopedic, especially as one listed the price of the software. Do add-ons and front-ends really belong here? Bwagstaff (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Especially for BackupAssist, the article text was such that made it sound like the site http://ntbackup-replacement.info is a discussion/documentation page about the replacement of ntbackup which it is not. It is just the product page for BackupAssist. I proceeded to change it, but did not remove the link entirely since it may be useful to somebody. Still if someone is more bold and feels it should be taken out entirely, let him go ahead. Steloukos (talk) 12:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatives are more like ads. However, readers may find addons useful if they extend important functionality/address a major limitation (in this case Firestreamer not limiting backup to tape drives). - xpclient ^Talk 13:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

licensed from Veritas

...XP's Backup Utility ... was licensed by Microsoft from Veritas Software... Veritas got it from Seagate Software. Veritas was merged into Symantec

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/windows-and-office/restore-a-lost-feature-and-install-xps-backup-utility-into-windows-vista/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NTBackup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120215074617/http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/E/6/5E66B27B-988B-4F50-AF3A-C2FF1E62180F/COR-T586_WH08.pptx to http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/E/6/5E66B27B-988B-4F50-AF3A-C2FF1E62180F/COR-T586_WH08.pptx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]