Jump to content

Talk:Nacional (weekly)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I added an NPOV tag because the article doesn't seem particularly neutral. The following text, for example, makes specific crticisms but lacks sources:

The articles bore a familiar pattern. Croatian war veterans were liberally denounced as drunkards, war profiteers, arms fixers and drug barons. Some verged on the farcical. Unidentified senior officers of the Croatian Ministry of Defence were accused of arms dealing with the IRA and ETA. This was clearly intended to signify General Gotovina whom Pukanic had previously accused as being the chief collaborator in an alleged presidential coup. The allegations were later discovered to have been fabricated in order to boost Nacional’s sales.

Cordless Larry 16:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC) .................................................................................................... Hi,[reply]

Could you please post the following links appoprately. Thanks. Mark P.


http://archiv2.medienhilfe.ch/News/2002/CRO/MOL0422.htm


“The weekly is owned by journalists, but the majority shareholder is Ivo Pukanic. Today Nacional has a circulation of around 35,000 copies. It is lower now than it was in the late 90s when all political weeklies in Croatia experienced a fall in circulations following the appearance of Jutarnji list. On the infrastructure of just only weekly, at the end of 2000 Pukanic launched the daily Republika, but it was shut down after just six months. Republika had been founded by a loan from Hypo Bank, which is today being paid back by Nacional. This partly influences its editorial policy. The paper has too many advertising items, i.e. articles which is hard to know if they are journalists’ items or advertising reportages.”

http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=548

“As to Nacional, it sympathises with Gotovina although General’s supporters accuse the editor, Ivo Pukanic of fake compassion and political opportunism. Between 1999 and 2001, Nacional launched a series of violent attacks against Gotovina.”

“Gotovina was also accused of plotting a military coup by the editor of Croatian weekly Nacional, Ivo Pukanic. His name was crossed out of military staff.”


http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/WestEurope_NEXUS.pdf

The bibliography of the above report, prepared for the US Library of Congress, contains reference to a Nacional article entitled ‘MORH protects arms dealers who smuggle weapons to ETA and the IRA’ dated 24th July 2002 which is used in the article. MORH is the Croatian ministry of defence, of which General Gotovina was Chief Inspectorate.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nacional (weekly). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]