Talk:National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Bias[edit]

What this page doesn't mention is that this organization has been known to abuse its massive constituent mailing list, sending unsolicited letters to Congress without the knowledge of those seniors. It seems to me that the NCPSSM has done a great job of "scrubbing" the Internet of all these criticisms.

This page contains no admission of its bias whatsoever. In politics, there is always a bias, which should be voluntarily revealed. This should be required for any politically related article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.128.130 (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add a more detailed, updated overview and history of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare[edit]

Hello,

In the name of transparency, let me start by saying I work for the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. This page popped up several years back and was created by someone who had a very limited knowleddge of the organization.

I would like to provide some major edits mainly in the History section as well as the recent legislative activities section. I would also like to update the board of directors entry as it is outdated and incorrect.

I understand in no way these edits should be self-promotional and I tried my best to delete any self promoting words. But, I must be doing something wrong because my edits did not go through. I added a large number of references, perhaps I should have used citations?

Anyways, I would really appreciate an editor's input on what was unacceptable about my edits, and how I can adjust them in a way that provides an accurate, neutral portrayal of the NCPSSM as well as providing the history of the organization.

JackieSndrs (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)JackieSndrs[reply]

In addition to the links at the top of this talk page, please keep in mind the information at found at wp:COI, wp:FAQ/Organizations & wp:NOBLECAUSE when editing this article. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]