This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This is not in FOCUS or the Elkman County Generator. Elkman Infobox indicates that it is "DO","DETERMINED ELIGIBLE/OWNER OBJECTION." Should it be in this table? KudzuVine (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can determine, Moore-Turner Garden is not listed individually on the NRHP. According to this document, it is a contributing property to the Marycliff-Cliff Park Historic District and is on local and state historic registers. User:Murderbike added the entry with this edit in October 2008. Murderbike was once very active in WP:NRHP, but has not made many contributions recently. Unless someone can come up with documentation to the contrary, I'm inclined to remove it from our table here. Anyone? --sanfranman59 (talk) 06:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've found many times where Wikipedians (even those who work with NRHPs) have mistakenly marked historic properties as NRHPs when they were not. Feel free to fix it. Also, you're in luck that I happen to have this on my watchlist otherwise I doubt you would have gotten an answer, especially since only 3 other users, besides myself, have this on their watchlist (and if you do, that means only two other users!). Killiondude (talk) 06:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I knew it was a long-shot that leaving a message here would shed any light. But I figured I'd follow protocol by giving people a chance to comment. I'll give it a few days and then remove the listing if no one else comments. BTW, how do you find out how many users have a page on their watchlist? --sanfranman59 (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This tool allows people to see how many users have a page watchlisted. However, for privacy purposes only a select few are allowed to see exact numbers of watchers when it is below 30 users. Because you likely do not have access, you'll probably see a dash in stead of a number for this page (indicating there are less than 30 people watching it). Killiondude (talk) 18:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the Moore-Turner Garden listing from the Spokane table. I'm pasting the code here so it's easy to retrieve in the future in case someone can show proof that it's on the NRHP. --sanfranman59 (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]