Talk:Near North Side, Chicago

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 17, 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

Is "Near North Side" a separate neighbourhood as well as the overall area ? Or should it be removed from the list of neighbourhoods ? -- Beardo 13:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article says that Water Tower Place is anchored by Lord & Taylor. This is no longer true, The space previously occupied by Lord & Taylor is currently vacant and will be replaced by several other retailers

The section where it quotes a Tribune article that 25,000 people have moved into the area to occupy 10,000 new units is not sufficiently documented to be worthy of inclusion. First of all the Tribune has a terrible history of fact-checking for what is essentially a fluff piece, second of all, for downtown a multiple of 1.5 residents per unit is the running average, so 10,000 units would bring in closer to 15,000 new residents. Second of all, some of those units would replace demolished buildings, and may even include apartments that were converted to condos. In other words, it's almost certainly not 10,000 NET new units. Additionally, for population figures one would have to subtract the significant number of public housing residents lost at Cabrini Green as well as the conversion of some small buildings in the Gold Coast to single family homes. Preliminary census numbers for Near North Side indicate about 80,474 residents now. This is over a 10% increase, which may not seem like a lot, but the median and average incomes have skyrocketed at the same time. Emathias (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Store list

Putting the list of stores in the middle of the entry is a bad idea. Who is going to check this list every six months to determine which of these stores are still there? At the very list they should be moved to the section at the bottom where the consulates and universities are listed although even then they would need to be checked frequently plus a list of new stores would also need to be checked Risssa (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Near North Side, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]