Talk:NeighborCity
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
techdirt
[edit]The techdirt cite has a bit of extra info on this company in a lawsuit with the NAR. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/18581320614/fight-over-real-estate-listings-escalates-as-neighborcity-counters-copyright-claims-with-antitrust-accusations.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.122.33 (talk • contribs) 2014-01-06T22:41:05 (UTC)
Yes and no. It's in the techdirt article, but in the comments section. The comments section isn't editor-reviewed.172.129.62.6 (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- What are you referring to? – SJ + 21:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Inaccurate and misleading information about realtor performance is posted on their website along with erroneous agent location, brokerage information.
[edit]This sentence was probably put in by a disgruntled realtor who was poorly rated. No one is watching out for this page, so it ends up with adds like this one that are off base.
"Inaccurate and misleading information about realtor performance is posted on their website along with erroneous agent location, brokerage information."
It should be deleted, and that' coming from an agent who should have a bone to pick with NeighborCity. What needs more coverage on this subject is the lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors. Can you write something since no one else is looking after this page? 64.182.119.244 (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- A common complaint online is that this system is inaccurate (by virtue of being automated); any such system does end up with some erroneous information that has to be fixed. I would prefer a citation for this, but left in a modified version of the claim. – SJ +
de-PROD
[edit]Some PR shills edited this article; that's a shame, we should clean it up. But it is notable if only for the number of different legal cases it has raised: we should certainly have an article about it. – SJ + 21:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NeighborCity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021063312/http://technorati.com/technology/article/berkshire-sues-neighborcitycom-in-ip-dispute/ to http://technorati.com/technology/article/berkshire-sues-neighborcitycom-in-ip-dispute/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)