Talk:Nodal admittance matrix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Energy  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge this article with Admittance parameters?[edit]

It has been proposed that Nodal admittance matrix be merged with Admittance parameters.

  • oppose as these appear to refer to different entities:
  • The nodal admittance matrix in the context of power engineering is not clearly defined by this page, but[now it is [1] ] seems to coincide with my understanding of this term in network theory - that is, it's the coefficients of the equations to be solved in nodal analysis. So Kirchhoff's current law is 0 = YV where Y is the nodal admittance matrix and V is a vector of voltages, being the voltage of each circuit node with respect to a common ground.
  • The matrix of admittance parameters relates port currents and port voltages in a black-box representation of a network (whose internal nodes are not considered). Each port consists of a pair of terminals carrying equal and opposite currents into and out of the box. There is no concept of a common ground.
Of course, both are square matrices of admittances. --catslash (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
oppose I agree. The nodal admittance matrix is an N x N matrix used in general circuit analysis of electronic circuits (networks). The admittance parameters are a 2 x 2 matrix used with the two-port network model. They're related, but not enough to merge into the same article --ChetvornoTALK 01:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

The (albeit meagre) response to this proposal over the last 18 months has been entirely negative. I shall therefore remove the merge templates. --catslash (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Editing the "Context" Section[edit]

I thought the "Context" Section of the article was very brief and could use some elaboration in order to make the purpose and origins of the admittance matrix more clear to readers without much background in electrical engineering. I expanded on why the admittance matrix is a useful tool and why computers are needed to solve these systems, as well as where the principles used to construct the admittance matrix come from, to hopefully give readers a better understanding of the concept.

S.ham2015 (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Construction of the Admittance Matrix in the "Design" Section[edit]

Using the subscript in the summation in the case where is confusing, as the variable is also used in the index of . Replacing in the summation with another variable may be helpful. For instance

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkaf (talkcontribs) 21:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Gkaf (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's clearer if the bound variable of the summation is distinct from the matrix row-number. I have changed it, but please be bold and do it yourself next time (also please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes ~~~~ or by pressing the signature button on the edit box tool bar).
The parameter is also confusingly named; would or be better? --catslash (talk) 00:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nodal admittance matrix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)