Talk:North American XB-28 Dragon
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I have always wondered why this bomber was considered as an alternative to B-25 and B-26 although it would have had the capabilities to replace the B-17 and B-24 in their strategic roles over Europe. Is no source available hat mentions this? Lastdingo (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Change title
[edit]I have removed the name "Dragon" from the text because there is no evidence that such a name was ever assigned to the aircraft and (as explained) three good reasons why it would not have been. LowObservable (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I believe this is correct actually as I can't source anything "official" that the XB-28 was nicknamed Dragon. Is there some documentation for this? TheStormofWar (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles