Talk:Object-Oriented Programming in Common Lisp

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

I bought this book hoping it would provide an in-depth tutorial on CLOS. Could she have chosen a worse example for the tutorial (locks)? Why would she choose something that only Lisp machines have and are difficult to reimplement on modern machines?

Very frustrating and disappointing, especially for a language that's so concerned with lasting a long time that the spec is intentionally silent on networking and other essential stuff.

huh? every kernel uses locks to synchronize stuff. --MarSch 10:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]