Talk:Obsessed (2009 film)/GA3
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: RAP (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
I might quick fail this. It seems it still has similar issues it had the last time. RAP (talk) 3:22 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah quick fail. Ending still in lead section, as is costume info that should be saved for it's respected section. Some references should be formatted and some character detail and actor perspective's of their character would be nice too. RAP (talk) 3:26 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to look at the article. Might I ask, why should costume info not go in the lead? The lead should summarise the entire article. Also, could you give an example of a malformed reference? Thanks. —Andrewstalk 04:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- The ending can't be there per WP:LEAD. What should be there is just a quick summary. Costume info isn't a thing that people would place in the lead either. Casting info is something that Wikipedia shines on, like were there any other actors considered for a role? What does the star think of the character? Stuff like that. As for the references, they should try to follow a similar pattern. Some have the source's author and others don't. RAP (talk) 1:26 21 January 2012 (UTC)