Talk:Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

information[edit]

This 501(c)3 venue will be opening in the spring of 2009 in Old Saybrook, Connecticut. It will be housed in a building circa 1910 that has already been placed on the National Register of Historic Places. The building is being renovated and added onto to make it an intimate 230 seat theatre. The website which is currently a blog is www.katharinehepburnteater.org

Katharine Hepburn called Old Saybrook home, in particular the borough of the town known as "Fenwick." Hepburn died five years ago in the rambling colonial mansion on Long Island Sound. The venue has the full backing of the Katharine Hepburn Estate and family Auntiemame40 (talk) 01:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Put this in the article for goodness sake! - Sgroupace (talk) 01:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Specs[edit]

Does anyone know where I could find the proposed tech specs for this space? From time to time I find myself looking for venues in the area of this theater and it would be great to have the tech specs. It would probably also be something good to have on the article page. Lekogm (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably specs you might be available now in the NRHP nomination document source which i just added. --Doncram (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sources[edit]

I added NRHP nom doc and NRHP infobox just now. This article could use more attention, perhaps including use of sources that might be found online. Please help!  :) Try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL and Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Try, for National Park Service material: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL Or develop from the sources already included in the article! Thanks. --Doncram (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]