Talk:One-star rank

Military history: Culture / South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / North America / United States Start‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Stars not only for generals

In Sweden, most ranks have stars. In Japan during WW2, even privaes, coporals and sergeans. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but I don't think that will have much impact (if any) on current usage and understanding that a "star rank" refers to generals and admirals. Yes, Sweden may use stars, but are those ranks referred to as "star ranks"? And if so, what do you propose? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussion

This article appears to contain an error common to many articles, see Talk:Five-star rank#Other affected articles and the discussion that immediately precedes it. Andrewa (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]