Talk:Oosaravelli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
 
WikiProject India / Andhra Pradesh / Cinema (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (marked as Low-importance).
 

Please stop vandalizing[edit]

please do not vandalize.Everything in this article complies with wikipedia T & C with proper referencing Pavancbz (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

@Pavancbz---its not POV. "Everything in this article complies with wikipedia T & C with proper referencing"--The article doesnt have any credible references...These sites are not reliable sources to mention and the article doesnt have any other sources for the way it was written. so its completely changed with some noted sources...

http://popcorn.oneindia.in/title/7398/oosaravelli.html

http://cinema.currentweek.net/2011/10/oosaravelli-second-week-collections.html

(Ssg2442 (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)) @Ssg2442 The first source you provide does not have any information about collections and the second source provided holds information about collections for two weeks.I am not going to make any comments regarding the movie verdict whether its a hit, average or flop. I was talking about statistics Pavancbz (talk) 06:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

@user-Pawancbz---hey i am not against to mention the budget and gross. "" http://cinema.currentweek.net/2011/10/oosaravelli-second-week-collections.html""--The source you provided is not from a credible/noted site. Please provide another reference for the gross. i dont know how much weightage does the above source carries..neither i havent seen mentioning this "cinema.currentweek.net" as a reliable source. For now i am removing the gross and you can mention with another source when you find one. Thanks (Ssg2442 (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC))

@Ssg2442: It looks like you are against NTR,you did not provide proper referencing that the gross is not right.please provide reliable source stating that the gross is not 71.32 crores.Please see the source below and please provide your so called reliable source before editing the article.Thanks http://www.andhrabuzz.com/viewnews.php?newsid=23403&category=Film%20news — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavancbz (talkcontribs) 15:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

@Pawan--If i am against NTR, then why would i rephrase summary and expand the reception with so called noted/reliable sites like deccan chronicle, sify, timesofindia, NDTV etc....? I dont know if the gross is correct or wrong, but if i have the proper source for it i would be the first person to put it in the infobox :) "you did not provide proper referencing that the gross is not right"--from my conversations, i believe i didnt talk about gross is wrong.

Please find another source supporting for gross as 71.32 crores... http://popcorn.oneindia.in/title/7398/oosaravelli.html, http://cinema.currentweek.net/2011/10/oosaravelli-second-week-collections.html, andhrabuzz, idlebrain, etc...are not reliable sources... If you do not agree with this, then probably i will involve two more editors in this. Thanks. (Ssg2442 (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC))

@Ssg2442 Gross is being changed to 71.62 crores with proper referencing.please check the link below. http://cinema.currentweek.net/2011/10/oosaravelli-second-week-collections.html we are not here to judge what are the actual collections ( if you think the gross is less).The source provides all the information with area wise.please go through. Pavancbz (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

@Pawan--I think i havent commented that the gross is less/box office verdit? i am not writing it as the film is super hit or blockbuster. All i am trying to keep the info accurate from some noted sites like TOI, DC, NDTV, Sify/rediff what ever. Please find another supporting source for the gross and buget. Pls continue editing..Thanks (Ssg2442 (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC))

Gross is being changed again and again by unregistered users despite requests.Gross collections of the movie is provided by a reliable website. Pavancbz (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Let me make this clear. A credible source is credible and an unauthentic source is one which is not credible. Regarding the response section, I would say that reliable sources would serve as a better alternative to notable sites (both are not the same, but usually they aren't different) for South Indian film articles as they do not have many suitable sources describing and reviewing a film in detail. And Oneindia.in is definitely a reliable source, but there have been many instances in which they have taken info from Wikipedia. Reports from the website must be checked with the articles to avoid any confusion. I think this guideline might help. Cinema.currentweek is a totally impertinent source and cannot be used and Idlebrain and Greatandhra are good enough for Telugu film articles as it is a question of experience and credibility. Hope this helps! Secret of success Talk to me 11:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)