Talk:Operation On-Target
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The excerpt was such a small percentage of the original page that it probably falls under fair use, however, to avoid controversy, I have re-written the article from scratch on the temp page. It is still a stub, unfortunately, but I am looking for someone that knows more about this to fix it up. NThurston 01:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Please add a suitable license for the Cloward photos on the Wikimedia pages
[edit]It was great to learn more about the early history of On Target, and to see the photos, but please note the warning message on the photos - since you have not provided a license, they are subject to deletion.
The discussion of licenses at Wikimedia is here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing
I would suggest one of these:
Release to public domain: (use this tag, substitute curly braces for parentheses): ((Cc-zero))
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. This template should only be used on file pages. |
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-0 http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/CC-0
Allowed for use with attribution: (use this tag, substitute curly braces for parentheses): ((Cc-by-3.0|1=))
| This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
This template should only be used on file pages. |
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-by-3.0 http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/CC-BY
Macchess (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Potential for Conflict of Interest
[edit]Three days ago, I became an associate administrator for a website that has been externally linked by this page (Operation On-Target)by an unrelated third party eight years ago. That website is the National BSA Operation On-Target site, http://www.bsaontarget.org/. Please let me know if any of my edits appear to be a conflict of interest in light of that association. Macchess (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC) As co-author of part of this page I have no problem with, and actually appreciate, the link to BSA's Operation On-Target site. Clowardja (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)