Talk:Operation Paravane

Operation Paravane is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 15, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 8, 2016	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 28, 2017	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Military history: Aviation / British / European / German / World War II / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase III)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Redevelopment

I'm developing a much more detailed replacement for this article at User:Nick-D/Drafts12, and will likely post it here in the next day or so. Any comments or edits before it goes live would be most welcome (as would comments and edits after it's posted, of course). Nick-D (talk) 07:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been posted. Nick-D (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other ships

The first picture ("A British Lancaster bomber over Kaafjord during Operation Paravane") shows three ships in the fjord. What were the other two, and what became of them?

Not sure this actually shows ships - they could be smoke floats. While there were several other warships present, no sources mention them being damaged. Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. (I'm the one who forgot to sign the earlier post.) I've done a bit of poking around, and actually found an answer here on Wiki -- apparently they were the flak ships Thetis and Nymphe. 71.235.184.247 (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about that either - Catechism targeted Tirptiz after she moved to a different port with less well established anti-aircraft defences and had been basically written off by the German Navy. While she was at Kaafjord it was common for repair ships to be moored near her, with the supporting destroyers and flak vessels being moored a bit further away. Nick-D (talk) 22:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The pointed ends lead me to believe they were ships -- I would think that smoke floats would more likely be square-ended barges, though of course the Germans would have used whatever was available. As close as they are to Tirpitz, though, it's amazing that they weren't hit by bombs that missed the intended target. 71.235.184.247 (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any sources which discuss where the bombs which missed the battleship ended up, despite this being studied fairly intensely for operations Obviate and Catechism. Nick-D (talk) 22:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible tweaks

Hi Nick-D, just read this again before TFA tomorrow and have 3 questions...

ref 93 Bishop 2012, pp. 341. - is there more than one page or should be singular?
Tromsø (twice) - should wlink be refined to Tromsø (city)?
dispatch v despatch - there are 3 x 'dis', 2 x 'des'

Thanks Nick, JennyOz (talk) 12:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thanks a lot for spotting these - I've fixed them all. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]