Talk:Optics and vision

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes

Created article per request at [Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hotlist of History of Ideas]. The initial article shamelessly copies from other wikipedia articles on each topic. (Hope this is OK) Rewriting, high level integration and a few images would be helpful. Canuck100 (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you would write a lead that explains what the unifying topic of the article is. It comes across as a bit of a hodgepodge at the moment. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my lead section

After skimming the history, it's worth mentioning that I wrote the lead by reading this article and summarizing some main points, unlike the previous attempt [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.160.115.10 (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely human-centric article despite claiming this is about other organisms too.

Somehow you say in your lead that this article is about vision in humans and other organisms yet the entire article is human-centric. Wow people, wow. Please stick to your claim and actually put information on other organisms too. 2001:FB1:97:207:F0F9:4C45:7C28:D130 (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]