Talk:OrCAD

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Location of components and interconnects

why dont the printed circuit board have component side and interconnect side on the same side

If its a surface mount board, it does. If its through-hole then in many cases you would not be able to get at the pad to solder on the top side because the component would be in the way! Bruern Crossing (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

the Altium links at the bottom (and there are several) seem to be just there as advertising a way from OrCAD to Altium's product family. I recommend removal. I would remove the anti ads as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.153.187.188 (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're equally bad? It doesn't make much difference now that OrCAD is non existent. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 07:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

The link "OrCAD at Cadence" is broken. --Mortense (talk) 08:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orcad schematic capture.PNG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Orcad schematic capture.PNG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with the article

This article has several issues:

a. Cadence Design Systems is listed as the original author and developer? I assume OrCAD products were created by OrCAD Systems and not by Cadence Design Systems.

b. "Capture does not contain in-built simulation features, but exports netlist data to the simulator, OrCAD EE." I assume this is a reference to the next section.

c. Why is PSpice referred to as "OrCAD EE" instead of "OrCAD PSpice" or "OrCAD EE PSpice"? I really don't understand what's the use of the "EE" in between anyway.

d. I don't see a reason for history and analysis to be listed at the same level with PSpice and PCB Designer so I indented them.

e. Actually, the analyses options in all OrCAD I ever used are "Time Domain (Transient)", "DC Sweep", "DC Sweep/Noise" and "Bias Point".

f. "Linear sweep, Logarithmic sweep, and Sweep over List of values". Do they need to be capitalized?

g. Does anybody know why the temperature is 27°C instead of 25°C which is typical in data sheets?

h. Does "Auto-Router" have to be capitalized?

i. There were two "History" sections so I changed the one with the history of the company to "Company" and I placed it at the top of the article. To me, it makes sense to read about the company and then its products. Yet, I get the feeling this article is primarily intended to highlight the products. Still, I think it should also cover the history of the company (unless the section on the history of the company can be split into an article called OrCAD Systems Corporation which is probably appropriate).

ICE77 (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]