This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
WOW is mentioned in the lead paragraph, but it's not specifically an orthodox organization, but rather either either multi-denominational, or conservative/reform. The wikipedia article on Women of the Wall states:
"From the start, Women of the Wall included Orthodox members and opted to run their service according to "Orthodox standards." Nevertheless, some Orthodox were offended, including some who call themselves Orthodox feminists.[6][7] Although Women of the Wall is a multi-denominational group, including not only Reform, but Conservative and Orthodox members, it has been viewed by some Israelis as a Reform organisation.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]"
Yaakovaryeh (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The relation of this organization to orthodox Judaism has not been established and the claims contained in this page are WP:POV. The recent rulings by both modern orthodox and agudat Israel make the claims contained in this article doubtful. I would suggest removing all mention of orthodox Judaism from the page, including the title. Council2 (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not our role (as Wikipedia editors) to accept other group's opionions of a group being valid/invalid/misnamed except to say that other groups feel this way. By cited ref, the article appears to describe how the subject group defines itself, so per WP:NPOV and WP:V that's what wikipedia reports. If Y says to X "You are not Y", that doesn't make it intrinsically and objectively true; if X says "I am a Y", then we can correctly report that "this is what Y is" because the whole subject is one of self-identification. And further, there are independent references that describe X this way, so it's not just Y rejecting X despite X's protest to the contrary. DMacks (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]