Talk:Osmar R. Zaiane

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Ramoz2 (talk · contribs)

Professor Zaiane is definitely notable in several fields. Among other recognition, he published the most cited paper in the history of educational data mining. -- Ryan Baker, Asst. Prof., Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Associate Editor, Journal of Educational Data Mining, with over 200 citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.237.241.98 (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If we look at the most cited authors in Computer Sciences by Citeseer as of 2010, Osmar Zaiane is not even in the top 10 000. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/stats/authors?all=true . I think that we should just delete this page from wikipedia. If we create a page for O. Zaine then, at least 10 000 other researchers from Computer Sciences deserves a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.116.247.36 (talk) 03:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CiteseerX, the descendent of citeseer, is not a reference for rankings authors. Their database is still very shallow and incomplete particularly due to the spelling of zaiane with umlaut. For instance zaane is the same. A paper by Zaiane et al. is cited 123 times according to citeseer but more than 480 times according to Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&sciodt=0%2C5&q=Discovering+Web+Access+Patterns+and+Trends+by+Applying+OLAP+and+Data+Mining+Technology+on+Web+Logs&btnG=Search&cites=8943299432605710396&as_sdt=2005&as_ylo=&as_vis=0). Microsoft Academic Search identifies 1169 citations for Zaiane's work (http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/190695/osmar-zaiane) and ranking him 225th in computer science (http://academic.research.microsoft.com/RankList?entitytype=2&topDomainID=2&subDomainID=7&last=0&start=201&end=300). Moreover, I don't think "notable" should be based on cumulative citations of produced papers. There is also the impact in the field, the awards, etc. (96.52.109.56 (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]