Talk:Owasco-class cutter

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Owasco-class cutter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Owasco-class cutter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the U.S. Coast Guard's Owasco class cutters Owasco, Winnebago (pictured) and Sebago were armed for World War II service but did not see combat until the Vietnam War?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Welland Canal detail?

Regarding this text:

Rationale Myths have long shadowed the design history of the 255-foot (78 m) class. These cutters were to have been much larger ships, and two theories persist as to why they were shortened. The first is that they were built to replace the ships given to Great Britain under lend-lease, and Congress stipulated that the Coast Guard had to build these replacement cutters to the same size and character as those provided to the British. The second is that their length was determined by the maximum length that could pass through the locks of the Welland Canal from the Great Lakes to the St. Lawrence River. The Great Lakes shipbuilding industry brought pressure on Congress to ensure that it had the potential to bid on the contract. The first theory seems to be correct, but the second cannot be ruled out.

However, the Welland Canal article does not agree that 255 (78m) feet is the maximum vessel length for the Welland Canal. In fact, it says of the present fourth canal, which was completed in 1932: "The maximum permissible length of a ship in this canal is 225.5 metres (740 feet)."

I am curious about this issue because the Safeguard-class rescue salvage ships, which were also built on the Great Lakes, are also 255 feet in length. -- Pamcwill (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Machinery

Anyone able to provide more details. "It had pilothouse control, variable-rate (10 to 1) burners" - was burner controls (fuel input rate) on the boilers actually controlled from the pilothouse, no human intervention? Confusing to me. This was potentially EXTREMELY innovative for the timeframe. Wfoj3 (talk) 01:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]