Talk:P.T. (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 20:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this review on. It looks very interesting. Be back in a few days with a full review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@Jhenderson777: There are the points that struck me immediately going through the references.

Refs 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31-36, 39, 40, and 43-46 - Please ensure all websites/magazines are properly linked.

If you meant their wikilink then

Done. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Remove the ".com" while addressing the issue above.

DoneJhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Refs 1-5, 11, 12, 14-20, 22, 24-30, 33-46 - Missing publishing dates. Please provide dates where possible.

Done all that I noticed. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be a general irregularity in the use of the "work=|publisher=" citation method and other ones. Since you seem more used to the "work=|publisher=", please ensure all references are formatted in this way where possible.

Done. I made them all website while I used publisher for the parent company. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that I used |website= because I felt that the article mostly contained it instead of the "work=" one you posted. I forgot you recommended "work=" method. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 00:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is optional, but archiving these references where possible is advisable. For GameSpot and Giant Bomb references, please use archived links prior to June of this year due to an archiving issue summarized and discussed here and here. When issue is fixed, archiving affected links can go ahead.

I plan to archive them. I will let you know when I am done. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am

Done...with the exception of two GameSpot pages due to the reason you already posted. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 23:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's what stood out. Once these are fixed, I will have another look through to see if anything else catches my eye. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've had another look through, and it looks like a Pass to me. A very interesting article, if somewhat tragic in subject. Makes me miss it even though I'm not into the genre. --ProtoDrake (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pass. I miss it too. At least we have Let's Play for memory. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 03:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]